Our generation grew up in workplaces believing that if we encountered unfairness, we should speak up.
We believed that communication could change the status quo, that if everyone worked hard, the company would improve.
But today, many young professionals think differently.
They can identify—quickly and precisely—what’s worth committing to and when it’s time to walk away.
One young colleague once told me bluntly:
“If I already know I’m not going to stay, why would I help you make things better?
Helping you is an investment in you.
If I don’t believe in you, I’m not wasting my time.”
This isn’t apathy—it’s a calculated economy of emotional labor: a shift from the gamble of “invest first, see if it pays off” to the investment mindset of “evaluate the soil before planting the seed”.
The real question is: What kind of environment makes people feel it’s worth investing themselves in?
The answer is a culture that tolerates mistakes. But tolerance alone isn’t enough—the real differentiator is whether you have the design sense to intentionally create that culture.
1. Why Design Has Become a Core Management Skill
When we think of “design,” most people picture aesthetics—color schemes, typography, layouts.
But in management, design sense goes far beyond visuals—it’s becoming a non-negotiable core capability for leaders.
1. The environment is too complex for “right answers.”
In the past, management was about using processes and rules to ensure correctness.
Today’s business environment changes so quickly that yesterday’s SOPs might be obsolete overnight.
Design-led management means thinking “from zero to one,” continually crafting solutions within constraints.
2. Talent needs to have their experiences “designed.”
Salary and benefits are just tickets to entry. What actually retains people is the experience of the work and the sense of achievement it provides.
These don’t happen by accident—they need to be deliberately designed, like a product: calibrating challenge levels, feedback rhythms, collaboration flow, and growth paths.
3. Leadership is about guiding, not controlling.
Younger generations crave autonomy and a sense of meaning.
Design-led management helps leaders shape team goals, communication styles, and meeting formats to spark participation.
4. Business competition is now “experience competition.”
Customers, users, and partners are making decisions based on the experiences you offer.
Leaders who can redesign processes and services through design thinking will make their teams memorable in the market.
2. Rethinking a Mistake-Tolerant Culture Through the Lens of Design
Three layers of a designed tolerance culture:
Surface layer: Experience Design
It’s not just about policy documents—it’s about:
-
Visualized learning tools: Turning failures into traceable learning journeys.
-
Ritual creation: Setting dedicated time and space for failure retrospectives.
-
Emotional connection: Making the team feel “we carry this together” rather than “you bear it alone.”
Middle layer: Interaction Design
The two examples you shared represent different types of interaction design:
-
Punitive interaction design:
-
Trigger: A problem occurs.
-
Response: Find the person at fault.
-
Outcome: Individual bears the consequence.
-
-
Learning-focused interaction design:
-
Trigger: An opportunity emerges.
-
Response: Collective analysis.
-
Outcome: System-level improvement.
-
Deep layer: Culture Design
The hardest part is designing psychological safety—making people believe:
“Even if I take a risk and fail, I won’t be abandoned.”
3. The Design Management Toolbox
A. Experience Design Tools
-
Productizing failure – Turn each failure into a learning product:
-
Give failed projects fun codenames (instead of burying them).
-
Create a “Failure Museum” to showcase mistakes as team assets.
-
Issue “Failure Certificates” to recognize those who dare to try.
-
-
Designing feedback rhythms
-
Real-time feedback: Don’t wait until the end of the month to say, “This direction is wrong.”
-
Constructive feedback: Not just what went wrong, but how to proceed.
-
Public feedback: Show the team that failure is supported, not punished.
-
-
Adjusting challenge levels – Like game design:
-
Newcomers: Tasks with a 60% success rate (build confidence).
-
Veterans: Challenges with a 40% success rate (keep things stimulating).
-
Team projects: 70% known + 30% exploratory (balance stability and innovation).
-
B. Interaction Design Tools
-
Redesigning meetings
-
“Hypothesis Testing Meetings”: Ask “What if we do this?” instead of “Why did you do that?”
-
“Learning Extraction Meetings”: Focused on what was learned from failure.
-
“Support Request Meetings”: Giving people an elegant way to ask for help.
-
-
Designing communication language – Change the opening lines:
-
Don’t say: “This project failed.”
Say: “What new insight did this project give us?” -
Don’t ask: “Who’s responsible?”
Ask: “How can we support this?”
-
C. System Design Tools
-
Designing resource allocation
-
80/20 rule: 80% of resources go to stable projects, 20% to experiments.
-
Failure budget: Reserve a set percentage each quarter for potentially unsuccessful trials.
-
Quick termination mechanism: End failed projects gracefully.
-
-
Designing growth paths – Ensure failure doesn’t derail personal development:
-
Skill maps: Show how failure still builds capabilities.
-
Rotation mechanisms: Failure doesn’t equal being sidelined.
-
Mentorship pairing: Experienced colleagues guide others through setbacks.
-
4. Defining the Boundaries of a Mistake-Tolerant Culture
Encouraged failure types:
-
Exploratory: Trying new methods or technologies.
-
Validative: Testing hypotheses, collecting data.
-
Collaborative: Costs from cross-departmental integration.
Unacceptable failure types:
-
Concealment: Hiding known problems.
-
Repetitive: Making the same mistake repeatedly.
-
Malicious: Knowingly violating rules or damaging the team.
5. Measuring the Effectiveness of Your Design Management
Quantitative indicators:
-
Frequency of proactive proposals: How often do team members pitch new ideas?
-
Number of cross-department projects: Are people willing to take the risk of “bothering others”?
-
Internal transfer success rate: Do talented employees believe in the company’s future enough to move internally?
-
Employee referral rate: Will top performers recommend friends to join?
Qualitative observations:
-
Speaking distribution in meetings: Is it just the manager talking?
-
Tone of failure discussions: Blame or exploration?
-
New hire question frequency: Are they comfortable exposing what they don’t know?
-
Occurrences of “I have an idea, but…”: How many assume they might be wrong before speaking?
6. Three Design Questions for Managers
1. User Experience: “Am I giving them a reason to stay?”
-
Beyond pay and benefits—what about work experience?
-
Are they learning new skills here?
-
After failure, can they still feel supported and see growth opportunities?
-
Is the work challenging but not crushing?
2. Interaction Design: “Is my response encouraging or punishing innovation?”
-
When hearing a new idea, is your first reaction “But…” or “Interesting—what next?”
-
When facing failure, do you first ask “Why?” or “What did we learn?”
-
In meetings, are you assigning blame or sharing resources?
3. System Design: “Does my environment make people feel safe to take risks?”
-
Is there time and budget for trial-and-error innovation?
-
Are people penalized in performance reviews for failing?
-
Does one failure label someone permanently?
7. Real-World Contrast: Two Management Approaches
Without design sense:
Engineer A spends two months improving the system, but gets criticized for “making unauthorized changes and causing chaos.”
This is classic control-based management design:
-
Trigger: A change is discovered.
-
Reaction: Find “who decided this without permission.”
-
Outcome: Revert to the old way, everyone learns to “play safe.”
With design sense:
Marketing associate B’s short video project flops. Her manager organizes a sharing session so she can distill lessons learned.
This is guidance-based management design:
-
Trigger: An opportunity is found.
-
Reaction: Ask “What did we learn?”
-
Outcome: The team grows together and keeps innovating.
The Core Belief of Design Management
In a fast-changing world, a mistake-tolerant culture isn’t just a retention strategy—it’s a competitive advantage.
But tolerance alone isn’t enough—the key is whether you have the design sense to intentionally create that culture.
The core belief of design management is:
Management is not about control—it’s about creating experiences.
When you start looking at management through a designer’s eyes, you’ll realize:
-
Every meeting is a user experience.
-
Every feedback is an interaction design.
-
Every decision is a system design.
Organizations that can experiment fast, learn fast, and adapt fast will find stable growth paths in uncertainty.
And it all begins with making everyone believe:
Here, courage matters more than perfection.
Experience matters more than rules.
Three Design Actions to Start Tomorrow
-
Redesign a meeting: Next time, start with “What experience do we want to create?” instead of “What topics do we need to discuss?”
-
Redesign a feedback: When someone makes a mistake, start with “Let’s look at this outcome together” instead of “Why did you do this?”
-
Redesign a challenge: Give the team a task where failure is allowed—and state upfront that failure is also a form of success.
